TECHNET Archives

March 1999

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Alderete, Michael" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Fri, 5 Mar 1999 09:26:16 -0800
Content-Type:
multipart/mixed
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1243 bytes) , application/ms-tnef (2937 bytes)
Wes-

5 micoinch Au is a typical, minimum thickness Au plating.

If you can calculate that it will go into solution, and form a solder joint
with less than 5% [less than 2%??] Au in PbSn, than you most likely are ok.

If the Au isn't allowed to disperse throughout most, or all, of the solder
joint, you may have localised high Au concentrated areas, which might pose a
reliability risk.

Can any of you metallurgists clarify whether this <5% Au rule of thumb (or
blind faith?) is in terms of volume or weight percentage of Au?

This is of great interest to those of us who'd like to convert from HASL PWB
pad finishes to Au/Ni, for SMT PWBs.

Regards,

Michael Alderete
Aerojet




Wes wrote...
------------------------------

Date:    Thu, 4 Mar 1999 14:23:20 -0500
From:    Malewicz Wesley <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Solder Attachment

        I have a part that is made out of .005 thick Beryllium Copper with a
finish per MIL-G-45204 Type 1 with 5 micro-inches Hard Gold.  This part is a
surface mount part and attached to the PCB via solder paste then re-flowed.
My question is, should I experience any long term reliability or soldering
problems with the attachment of this part?

Thanking you in advance for your comments.

Wes

------------------------------



ATOM RSS1 RSS2