TECHNET Archives

March 1999

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Collins, Graham" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Wed, 3 Mar 1999 07:53:48 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (70 lines)
Nancy, Phil
I have to disagree with Phil somewhat, if good precautions are taken.  If
Nancy's line operates on a quick enough basis that there isn't a huge WIP
build-up between assembly and test then go for it.  If there is (ideally) an
inline ICT machine to make sure the caps/resistors are good, then your
rework exposure is minimal.  If however the more usual batch build concepts
are applied (100+ WIP between build and test) then I agree with Phil's
warning.

Sometimes space limitations make it worthwhile to do these things - if this
is a laptop product then that extra space required can make the unusual
worth doing.  Somewhat like the stacked memory chips IBM used to use in
mainframe memory boards...

Good luck!
 - Graham Collins

-----Original Message-----
From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 1999 8:34 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] 0402's under BGA problems?


Hi Nancy -
Your question reminds me of a "concept" that was done - for a while - in the
early days of SMT.  People would place a discreet component (usually a
decoupling capacitor) under a PLCC>  There was no problem, per se, soldering
it, even the then common Convection/IR ovens (heat is conducted through the
substrate).  A lot of folks were patting themselves on the back for this
wonderful PCB real estate saving set-up - particularly memory module
assemblers.  What they soon found out was that, if there was a problem with
that inexpensive little discreet  - component failure, bad joint, etc -
they
had to remove an expensive PLCC to correct the problem.  In light of the
exponential "fun" of removing and replacing a BGA to get at that 0402, my
recommendation is DON'T DO IT!

Phil Zarrow
SMT Process Consultant
ITM, Inc.
Durham, NH  USA
www.ITM-SMT.com

################################################################
TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following
text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet
################################################################
Please visit IPC's web site (http://www.ipc.org) "On-Line Services" section
for additional information.
For technical support contact Hugo Scaramuzza at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.312
################################################################

################################################################
TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet 
################################################################
Please visit IPC's web site (http://www.ipc.org) "On-Line Services" section for additional information.
For technical support contact Hugo Scaramuzza at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.312
################################################################


ATOM RSS1 RSS2