TECHNET Archives

March 1999

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Thornton White <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Mon, 29 Mar 1999 08:54:56 +1200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
Dear Technetters

I have a question about UV exposure lamps. We currently use mercury
capillary lamps to expose our dry film photoresist and our photoimageable
soldermask. The exposure specification for both these materials is for a
light wavelength between 360 and 380 nanometres.

I have been shown the spectral distribution for our lamps - only 20% of the
radiated energy is in the 320 - 400nm radiation band, over 50% is in the
higher visible and infared bands (which do not assist exposure).

Are mercury capillary lamps the norm for exposure work or are there more
appropriate lamps for this sort of application.

Any information would be appreciated.

 Best Regards

Thornton White

################################################################
TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet 
################################################################
Please visit IPC's web site (http://www.ipc.org) "On-Line Services" section for additional information.
For technical support contact Hugo Scaramuzza at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.312
################################################################


ATOM RSS1 RSS2