TECHNET Archives

February 1999

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Hamilton, Richard -4454" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Wed, 3 Feb 1999 11:01:45 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (68 lines)
Werner,

I am also working in evaluation of VOI for our process. The directive came
from up stairs and my first reaction was, what for? We are pretty simple
when it comes to SM: .031"pitch, one QFP per assy. And we are not having
problems with the paste printing process (that we know of!!)

I have identified the January article, but have not read it yet.

Got any ideas on how to quantify the 'non-effectiveness' of measuring paste
height? I know when I go back with the prices, that alone will cause a few
palpitations! I don't want to just say it is too expensive for our use. And
in our case, Yes, the paste height has been identified as a reliability
issue, but not by anyone who knows if it really is or not.

Richard Hamilton
Clemar Mfg. / Rain Bird
[log in to unmask]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Werner  Engelmaier [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Monday, February 01, 1999 2:31 PM
> To:   [log in to unmask]
> Subject:      Re: [TN] Solder Paste volume Standards
>
> HI TJB1,
> How do you define 'optimum solder paste volume'?
> Do you believe that solder volume relates to reliability?
> As the article in SMT January 1999 points out, shadowing makes the
> determination of solder volume very tricky at best, and it really does not
> correlate with anything important. There certainly are no 'Solder Paste
> Volume
> Standards', and there should not be.
>
> Werner Engelmaier
> Engelmaier Associates, L.C.
> Electronic Packaging, Interconnection and Reliability Consulting
> 7 Jasmine Run
> Ormond Beach, FL  32174  USA
> Phone: 904-437-8747, Fax: 904-437-8737
> E-mail: [log in to unmask]
>
> ################################################################
> TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
> ################################################################
> To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with
> following text in the body:
> To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
> To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet
> ################################################################
> Please visit IPC's web site (http://www.ipc.org) "On-Line Services"
> section for additional information.
> For technical support contact Hugo Scaramuzza at [log in to unmask] or
> 847-509-9700 ext.312
> ################################################################

################################################################
TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet 
################################################################
Please visit IPC's web site (http://www.ipc.org) "On-Line Services" section for additional information.
For technical support contact Hugo Scaramuzza at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.312
################################################################


ATOM RSS1 RSS2