TECHNET Archives

February 1999

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Edward Brunker <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Fri, 19 Feb 1999 10:32:45 GMT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (119 lines)
ok

______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: TechNet: confirmation required (6F2282)
Author:  "L-Soft list server at IPC (1.8c)" <[log in to unmask]> at INTERNET
Date:    19/02/99 04:21


The TechNet list has been configured  to request explicit confirmation of all
messages posted to the list, for  security reasons. You must now confirm that
the message enclosed below did originate from  you. To do so, simply reply to
the present message  and type "OK" (without  the quotes) in the  text of your
message. If this does not work, or if the message did NOT originate from you,
contact the list owner for assistance.

------------------ Original message (ID=6F2282) (91 lines) --------------------
Received: from simon.ipc.org by jefry.ipc.org (LSMTP for Windows NT v1.1a) with
TP id <[log in to unmask]>; Fri, 19 Feb 1999 4:21:24 -0600
Received: from mailgate.psion.com by simon.ipc.org via ESMTP (951211.SGI.8.6.12.
TCH1502/940406.SGI)
        for <[log in to unmask]> id EAA01676; Fri, 19 Feb 1999 04:10:17 -0800
Received: from smtpgate.psion.com (smtpgate.psion.com [194.129.2.239])
          by mailgate.psion.com (2.5 Build 2640 (Berkeley 8.8.6)/8.8.4) with
          SMTP id KAA00291 for <[log in to unmask]>; Fri, 19 Feb 1999 10:10:54 GMT
Received: from ccMail by smtpgate.psion.com (ccMail Link to SMTP R8.20.00.25)
    id AA919420092; Fri, 19 Feb 1999 10:28:17 GMT
Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]>
X-Mailer: ccMail Link to SMTP R8.20.00.25
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 10:19:56 GMT
From: "Edward Brunker"<[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re[2]: [TN] Squeegee Speed
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: "cc:Mail Note Part"



>The factorinfluencing this effect is how stencil gaskets to the board and
>you may need to look as points such as :   Board finish

>Regards
>Edward Hale


     I find this aspect intersting. Resist height is always more than the
     plated copper height. For all alternative finishes with LPI, in my
     experience. The resist over traces leading to pads brings the resist
     up even more. The dome on HASL boards will protrude above, but only
     for a portion of the pad, the edges still remain lower.
     Does anyone spec the resist height to be less than the pads?
     So stencils rest on the resist leaving 10 - 30 microns of free space
     underneath.


     Regards
     Edward Brunker


>Evenin' all!
>
>        My question is this:  My stencil printer operator has said that he
>has to
>wipe our 6-mil stencil each pass to get the paste in the 20-mill pitch
>aperatures for a QFP to release well.  We are using Amtech NC-559 type 3
>paste with 89.5% metal.  The paste is not old.  I considered using type 4
>paste, which has a much finer powder in it. I was told by Amtech that this
>finer powder paste will pack more densly into the aperatures and I could get
>some bridging, unless I order a new stencil with aperature reductions.  Our
>squeegee speed is 0.6 inches/s, or 15mm/s.  Is this too slow?  Amtech
>suggested that at this slow speed, the paste could be rising out of the
>aperature, as if someone pressed on a wet sponge and it rose back to its
>original shape.  What is a good squeegee speed for 20 mil pitch parts?
>Thanks all!
>
>Ryan Jennens
>TelGen Corp.
>
>################################################################
>TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
>################################################################
>To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with
>following text in the body:
>To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
>To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet
>################################################################
>Please visit IPC's web site (http://www.ipc.org) "On-Line Services"
>section for additional information.
>For technical support contact Hugo Scaramuzza at [log in to unmask] or
>847-509-9700 ext.312
>################################################################

################################################################
TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
n the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet
################################################################
Please visit IPC's web site (http://www.ipc.org) "On-Line Services" section for
ditional information.
For technical support contact Hugo Scaramuzza at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700
t.312
################################################################

################################################################
TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet 
################################################################
Please visit IPC's web site (http://www.ipc.org) "On-Line Services" section for additional information.
For technical support contact Hugo Scaramuzza at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.312
################################################################


ATOM RSS1 RSS2