TECHNET Archives

February 1999

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bryan Kerr +44 1383 822131 ext 4409 <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Mon, 15 Feb 1999 13:57:25 +0000
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (24 lines)
It is my experience that the analysis of Tin in solders is not the most
accurate and reliable test, normally done by wet chemistry. OK the test house
may claim + or - 0.01% however I have had samples re-tested before and had
differing results obtained. I would advise having samples re-tested and be
absolutely sure of your tin level before considering messing around with the
tin content by adding more tin. A good guideline is to calculate the
theoretical weight of tin lost since the last analysis. If it's several kilo's,
you'll know that there's something amiss with the test result !

Bryan Kerr
Alenia Marconi

################################################################
TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet 
################################################################
Please visit IPC's web site (http://www.ipc.org) "On-Line Services" section for additional information.
For technical support contact Hugo Scaramuzza at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.312
################################################################


ATOM RSS1 RSS2