TECHNET Archives

January 1999

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Rick Thompson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Thu, 21 Jan 1999 08:39:15 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (110 lines)
Earl,

We bought the SRT 1000 after looking at after looking at Conceptronics,
Air-Vac & SRT units. While all seem capable of handling the job, the ease of
use of the SRT was one of the factors we  liked.  From an operator
standpoint, it's pretty straight forward. At the time we looked last year,
both Conceptronics and Air-Vac had interfaces that we felt were more
daunting for our typical operator.  No problem for the engineer setting up
profiles, but we don't use them to run the machine <g>.  We also talked to
some heavy users of the equipment and got very positive feedback on the SRT
from Intel, HP & Silicon Graphics among others. Of course these were names
supplied by SRT so I'd expect them to be favorable.  However in almost 1
year of use I'd have to concur.

Regarding the pickup tube, SRT's claimed accuracy and repeatability is very
good, and we haven't had reason to question it. Placements are dead on as
far as we can tell.  While the tube probably is susceptible to damage, the
only time anyone should be handling it, or even near it when extended is
when doing maintenance.

In terms of operation, I actually prefer the convection pre-heat on the SRT
to the IR pre-heat used by Conceptronics, although both vendors have reasons
their's is better.  With the number of thermocouples available, we can
pretty accurately reproduce profiles identical to what we'd want to see in
our ovens.

Programming has been pretty straight forward, although as you note, you do
have to edit program files manually.  From what I recall, both Conceptronics
& Air-Vac required something similar.  Shouldn't be a problem for your
engineer.

Regards,

Rick Thompson

> -----Original Message-----
> From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of [log in to unmask]
> Sent: Thursday, January 21, 1999 6:34 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [TN] Solder fountain devices and BGA/Fine pitch repair/rework
> stations
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I will be evaluating and qualifying two equipment types. The
> first is a fountain soldering
> device. I need practical advice on all the stuff you guys and
> gals know about as good, bad,
> ugly, best applications, setup, limitations, and all the
> rest. I've never used one of these
> things and would appreciate any experienced input.
>
> I am inheriting an SRT 1000 BGA/Fine pitch rework/repair
> station. So far it looks straight
> forward and easy to program and operate. I do question having
> to edit INI files to set some
> parameters for board and component types, and sequences, etc.
> Additionally, the very long
> removal and replacement arm/rod/tube seems very vulnerable
> and I can't help wondering about
> repeatabillity let alone initial accuracy though, from what
> I've seen so far, no worries? Any
> experienced input concerning operations, do's, dont's,
> capabilities, limitations, etc. also
> would be appreciated.
>
> I've used both the big Conceptronic and Pace types. They both
> work well though I tend to lean
> toward the Pace as it is simpler and easier to program with
> better placement features. I do
> like the Conceptronic bottom side "pre-heaters" and the SRT
> heaters work well. Still, I've
> only been introduced to the SRT and would like objective
> comparisons and information as in
> the above.
>
> Thanks everyone,
>
> Earl Moon
>
> ################################################################
> TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using
> LISTSERV 1.8c
> ################################################################
> To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask]
> with following text in the body:
> To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
> To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet
> ################################################################
> Please visit IPC's web site (http://www.ipc.org) "On-Line
> Services" section for additional information.
> For technical support contact Hugo Scaramuzza at
> [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.312
> ################################################################
>
>

################################################################
TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet 
################################################################
Please visit IPC's web site (http://www.ipc.org) "On-Line Services" section for additional information.
For technical support contact Hugo Scaramuzza at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.312
################################################################


ATOM RSS1 RSS2