TECHNET Archives

December 1998

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Joy, Stephen C" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Fri, 18 Dec 1998 07:31:00 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (36 lines)
Les,

The problem with TDR is that everyone has a good P/T but can't correlate to
anyone else.

My search for a non destructive method of checking dielectric spacing is to
find
a mechanical way to measure impedance.

I am only concerned with trace perimeter and dielectric thickness. Dk is
more
difficult to measure and I hoped I could make it a constant at the nominal
impedance value we fix and the construction we specify. I know we are not
the
PCB experts, but the tolerances are so tight that we need at least to create
a
consensus from the PCB manufacturers for construction.

Is there any hope here or am I just wasting my time?

Thanks for all the responses on this.

Steve

################################################################
TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet 
################################################################
Please visit IPC's web site (http://www.ipc.org) "On-Line Services" section for additional information.
For technical support contact Hugo Scaramuzza at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.312
################################################################


ATOM RSS1 RSS2