TECHNET Archives

December 1998

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Tue, 8 Dec 1998 08:22:32 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (77 lines)
        I have observed many pin loaders, from the first "shaker tables" in 1986 to
the latest offerings. Like anyone that has ever loaded a fixture late at
night, I have always desired the mechanical solution. Some loaders have
found good homes in shops with specific needs, most have not for many
reasons.

1) Like the 1st generation CAD routers, they can do 98% of the job with
relative ease, however cleaning up the last 2% is a manual job made 10x
worse, that can be extremely time consuming.

2) Mixed pin sizes and styles are not handled gracefully in some designs.

3) The excess working inventory required for shaker tables (1000's of pins)
always seems to be in another fixture that need to be used tomorrow. The
cost of the inventory also needs to be calculated into the loader cost.
(Test Rule #5, You Never, Ever Have Enough Test Pins")

4) The effectiveness  of the load decreases with pin tilt, the biggest, high
tilt fixtures you really need help on tend to have the most miss-loads.

5) Bluntly speaking, the labor you hope to replace by purchasing the
equipment is the lowest paid, least skilled person in the shop. Since the
end result is the same, its basically a bean counters game and the payback
is a long, long time.

6) Good Fixture Design (Test Rule #1) can increase fixture load speed
without additional equipment. I have seen 5000 pins per hour loaded by hand
time after time, although I admit it was by others with some degree of
eye/hand coordination (I am somewhat of a klutz).

Doug

> -----Original Message-----
> From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Test Engineering
> Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 1998 7:53 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [TN] Bare Board Test: Automatic Pin Loaders
> Importance: High
>
>
> Has anyone had experience with auto loaders for test fixtures?... Who
> supplies them?... I know of Intertrace Technologies APL-2000/200 and PDIs
> pin loader. How well do they operate?
>
> Blaine R. Shelkey
> Test Engineering
> 407.752.8843 (Ph)
> 407.752.8868 (Fax)
> [log in to unmask]
>
> ################################################################
> TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
> ################################################################
> To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with
> following text in the body:
> To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
> To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet
> ################################################################
> Please visit IPC's web site (http://www.ipc.org) "On-Line
> Services" section for additional information.
> For technical support contact Hugo Scaramuzza at [log in to unmask]
> or 847-509-9700 ext.312
> ################################################################
>

################################################################
TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet 
################################################################
Please visit IPC's web site (http://www.ipc.org) "On-Line Services" section for additional information.
For technical support contact Hugo Scaramuzza at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.312
################################################################


ATOM RSS1 RSS2