DESIGNERCOUNCIL Archives

December 1998

DesignerCouncil@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
KELLY M SCHRIVER <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
DesignerCouncil E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Mon, 14 Dec 1998 16:26:00 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
Scott -

I think most of us are leaving all of the unused pads in place on plated thru
holes and vias, unless removal is necessary to increase routing density.
Leaving the pad stack intact adds just a bit of  uniformity and stability to
the hole.   With part of the pads gone, Z axis attachment of the barrel can
vary considerably.  This gets more important as the hole aspect ratio
increases.

ITRI recently completed some testing dealing with allowable misregistration,
which strongly supports the stability theory.  This testing suggests that a
trace connecting directly to a barrel will survive IF a pad is present, even
though severely misregistered (giving a breakout condition).

Regards - Kelly

################################################################
DesignerCouncil E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE DesignerCouncil <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil 
################################################################
Please visit IPC's web site (http://www.ipc.org) "On-Line Services" section for additional information.
For technical support contact Hugo Scaramuzza at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.312
################################################################


ATOM RSS1 RSS2