Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 30 Dec 1998 07:52:13 -0600 |
Content-Type: |
multipart/mixed; boundary="---- =_NextPart_000_01BE33C9.508B44A0" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I agree with the sentiments below. The confirmation effort really makes no difference to those who "choose" to commercialize their postings. Basically we are ( or at least supposed to be ) adult professionals here. Personnally I dont really mind a few commercial zings so long as I get the information Im interested in.
I have obtained a tremedous amount of information off of this formal for which I would like to thank IPC and all of you who use the forum.
As far as the confirmation goes, get rid of it. I cant tell you how often I responded to a posting while I was "taking a few moments out of a hetic schedule" to converse with my fellow techies only to pop back in my office an hour or so later and have to confirm the sending. Time lost! Need I say more.
I would like to pose one question. Does IPC feel the confirmation has been a benefit?
Thanks for you time
Ed Cosper
----------
From: Paul Klasek
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 1998 8:09 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Oxide rework > confirmation reconsideration hope ?
Rudy's insights most of the time hit the mark pretty well ; likely because
he's in the commercial business ;
and while I understand the need for not getting the floodgates open ;
to keep it dry 100% so far led us only to burden us with the obviously not
so effective confirmation rigor which just keeps putting off answers of the
busy folks .
This sort of "game" understanding is totally unrealistic ; soon we'll have
more onlookers than experts just because the new age "correctness" is way
too easy to apply .
Here we cry for answers, pissing off the same time most seasoned people in
ranks ; I've had it !
Can we grow up and have a real exchange ?
By the way Jack ; or Hugo ; is there any way we take a vote on this one ;
I'd say majority would like to lift this feature ;
would it be possible ?
Actually I'd say most of the answers do go direct nowadays ; my stats show
less answers since intro, with more people ;
it's obvious this forum is loosing mementum ; give it a thought .
Quite a few people answering before with genuine educationals in mind (yes ;
of cause it's good for business as well ; who gives a damn as long as we get
the answers );
disappeared from the scene more or less ; or give you one liners like latest
Jerry's ; in order to be politically correct .
Werner's calls to lift this lid did not find any Forum reply ; it's getting
way too constrained .
Thanks ; Hugo ; & Jack ; & ..........
Paul Klasek
http://www.resmed.com
> ----------
> From: Roger Mouton[SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Saturday, 19 December 1998 8:14
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [TN] Oxide rework
>
> Rudy - When are you going to stop commercializing this information
> exchange
> forum? Why can't you respond directly to the person posting this TechNet
> message rather than taking advantage of the forum?
>
> ################################################################
> TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
> ################################################################
> To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with
> following text in the body:
> To subscribe: SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
> To unsubscribe: SIGNOFF TechNet
> ################################################################
> Please visit IPC's web site (http://www.ipc.org) "On-Line Services"
> section for additional information.
> For technical support contact Hugo Scaramuzza at [log in to unmask] or
> 847-509-9700 ext.312
> ################################################################
>
################################################################
TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe: SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
To unsubscribe: SIGNOFF TechNet
################################################################
Please visit IPC's web site (http://www.ipc.org) "On-Line Services" section for additional information.
For technical support contact Hugo Scaramuzza at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.312
################################################################
|
|
|