TECHNET Archives

November 1998

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Tue, 17 Nov 1998 14:20:20 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
Subject:    Through hole vs SMT
Author: GREGORY SHERWOOD
Date:       11/17/98 2:20 PM

I'm looking for information (ie: Trade studies, Technical briefs, papers...etc)
comparing the cost of: 100% through hole PWB design  to SMT or mixed design
using PWB fabrication,       e-comps, & ass'y time as cost criteria. Also would
like info. on reliability comparisons. The current design is 100% through hole
for a Military application. Current dwgs. utilize IPC's for PWB design &
fabrication rqmts, & J-STD for workmanship criteria. Even though the information
I'm seeking is is probably quite dated; (ie: late 70's, early 80's vintage) it
will serve my needs.
I would greatly appreciate any & all info. pertaining to above!

                                Thank You,
                                Greg
E-MAIL : [log in to unmask]
PHONE: (612) 572-6652
FAX: (612) 572-4886

################################################################
TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet 
################################################################
Please visit IPC's web site (http://www.ipc.org) "On-Line Services" section for additional information.
For technical support contact Hugo Scaramuzza at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.312
################################################################


ATOM RSS1 RSS2