TECHNET Archives

October 1998

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Ratte <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Thu, 1 Oct 1998 12:21:52 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (128 lines)
Don't forget about the wire bonding bible:

Wire Bonding in Microelectronics Materials, Processes, Reliability & Yield
          George Harman
          ISBN: 0-07-032619
          IMAPS Member: $65, Nonmember: $115

http://www.imaps.org/pubs.htm




----------
From:  Terry Regan [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
Sent:  Wednesday, September 30, 1998 3:35 PM
To:  [log in to unmask]
Subject:  Re: [TN] Fab:  Multiple surface finishes

Glenn and Michael,
    It is true that 30u" is typically an acceptable gold thickness for
thermosonic bonding.  In fact, we have customers that have had tremendous
success bonding to 17u".  There are many criteria which can affect the
bondability including the Nickel underlay, the pourosity of the Nickel and the
Gold platings, the chuck temperature, the plasma cleaning process, etc.  The
real catch is understanding and characterizing your bonding equipment with the
product supplied by your substrate manufacturer.  Performance of a given
thickness of gold from one supplier is probably not the same as that thickness
from another supplier.  There is a definite need to form a relationship with
your supplier and work with them to define the optimum parameters.  A DOE would
probably do the trick.  (then don't let your buyers go on a "price" hunt for
suppliers)

Terry Regan
HADCO

____________________Reply Separator____________________
Subject:    [TN] Fab:  Multiple surface finishes
Author: "Alderete; Michael" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:       9/30/98 2:44 PM

Glenn-

Hadco (Watsonville CA) recently talked us into 30 microinches Au, vs.
our original 50 microinch callout, on BT laminate. We established that
reliable Au wire wedge bonds could be made at 30, before we approved the
order. We're now thinking that we could make good wire bonds to
something less than 30, but we haven't tried. Maybe Hadco (or someone
else) can recommend minimum Au plating for Au wire bonding AND
(eutectic) soldering.

-Michael Alderete


You wrote...
------------------------------

Date:    Wed, 30 Sep 1998 10:31:54 PDT
From:    glenn pelkey <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Fab:  Multiple surface finishes

Hello all,

     I'm looking for information on how to build a board with both soft
gold and solder as outer layer surface finishes.  We want to make sure
it is manufacturable before designing it.  The only thing I have now are
examples with edge connectors.  The gold and solder would be at select
locations throughout the board.

     In case you're wondering why, I'll tell you.  We want to increase
the gold thickness to greater than 70 microinches for wire bonding.
But, this product also has screened solder for SMT.  Since sceening
limits the amount of solder, gold embrittlement becomes an issue.  I
calculated 3.7% of gold by weight at 70 microinches.  I know opinions
vary here, but I think everyone can agree that this is at least a
concern.

      What do you think?  How hard is this to do?  Contamination,
increased cost, other reliabilty or quality issues to trade off?

Thanks for all your help.

Glenn Pelkey
Maxtek Components Corp.
[log in to unmask]
[log in to unmask]

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

------------------------------

################################################################
TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet
################################################################
Please visit IPC's web site (http://www.ipc.org) "On-Line Services" section for
additional information.
For technical support contact Hugo Scaramuzza at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700
ext.312
################################################################

################################################################
TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet
################################################################
Please visit IPC's web site (http://www.ipc.org) "On-Line Services" section for additional information.
For technical support contact Hugo Scaramuzza at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.312
################################################################

################################################################
TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet 
################################################################
Please visit IPC's web site (http://www.ipc.org) "On-Line Services" section for additional information.
For technical support contact Hugo Scaramuzza at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.312
################################################################


ATOM RSS1 RSS2