TECHNET Archives

October 1998

TechNet@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Oxide / Durabond Alternatives
From:
Ed Cosper <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Fri, 9 Oct 1998 11:52:39 -0500
Content-Type:
multipart/mixed
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1251 bytes) , application/ms-tnef (2022 bytes) 
Have you considered double treated copper?

----------
From:   J M
Sent:   Thursday, October 08, 1998 1:24 PM
To:     [log in to unmask]
Subject:        [TN] Oxide / Durabond Alternatives

We are in the process of selecting a new line for prelamination, and we
would like to know of other proven alternatives to Oxide/Durabond.
We also would like to have a fully conveyorized system capable of
linking to conveyorized AOI and to Lamination.
Thank you for your help

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

################################################################
TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet
################################################################
Please visit IPC's web site (http://www.ipc.org) "On-Line Services" section for additional information.
For technical support contact Hugo Scaramuzza at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.312
################################################################

ATOM RSS1 RSS2