Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | TechNet E-Mail Forum. |
Date: | Tue, 6 Oct 1998 08:49:56 +1000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Sherman ;
This may be not the answer you seek ; so : "believe it or not" :
There are few relatively bizarre practices ; but I'd say whole SMT
progress is from first glance :
resistors venting heat standing on side are prescribed quite often ;
as the reliability guys here often said the less (up to a limit) solder
the more reliable the joint (visible in new cap pad footprints) .
Not that I'd find res. hooked on corners particularly appealing from a
lot of other views ; but they live
On your subject :
I did the same (stacking) in telecom application in past (drop tests;
vibrating at "railway" frequencies >you name it [calibration mainly) ;
and still here in R&D runs ;
as long as you have the heat dissipation (bit impeded in bottom two)
under control and smear the paste sideways without much mess you have no
problem . 1206 metalisation is actually asking for it (fairly "rich") ,
very robust standard pads will have no problem holding 3 stack .
As long as he's got the track to cope with the stack ; he's in the
obviously constrained design situation making sense to me .
PS
You won't find this specific "rules" . Rules, generally, are something
to quiz constantly anyhow, for a lot of reasons
PPS
If you handle them in post reflow assy (like calibrations) try to use
paste and fine heat jet (with thermocoupler on hand first time) ;
the bugs will get less shocked than with the traditional wire &
overblasted tip . Hold the stack with needle from top (drop arm) .
See you
Paul Klasek
http://www.resmed.com
> ----------
> From: Sherman Banks[SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Tuesday, 6 October 1998 6:54
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [TN] ASSY: stacking 1206 chip resistors
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> We've got an engineer who wants to stack 1206 resistors 3 high in
> order to
> achieve a larger power rating. While it is intuitively obvious to us
> that
> this is NOT the way to go, we are at a loss to find any published
> documents
> that caution or forbid the practice.
>
> Can anyone cite a published source that can give more specific "rules
> or
> guidelines" on this subject.
>
> We've searched, J-STD-001, SM-780, SM-782, A-610, and R-700
>
> Help!!!!!
>
> REGARDS
> Sherman Banks
> [log in to unmask]
> 408/481-6047
>
> ################################################################
> TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV
> 1.8c
> ################################################################
> To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with
> following text in the body:
> To subscribe: SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
> To unsubscribe: SIGNOFF TechNet
> ################################################################
> Please visit IPC's web site (http://www.ipc.org) "On-Line Services"
> section for additional information.
> For technical support contact Hugo Scaramuzza at [log in to unmask] or
> 847-509-9700 ext.312
> ################################################################
>
################################################################
TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe: SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
To unsubscribe: SIGNOFF TechNet
################################################################
Please visit IPC's web site (http://www.ipc.org) "On-Line Services" section for additional information.
For technical support contact Hugo Scaramuzza at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.312
################################################################
|
|
|