Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 15 Oct 1998 13:41:29 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
X-cc: |
|
Content-Type: |
multipart/mixed; boundary="------------19C8F94324F03A0B0F39D59C" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Chris,
PCDesign magazine recently had the PCB Benchmark results... I think
it was the March issue ?
Mentor didn't participate.
Karl
Chris Otis wrote:
> PCB Tool Users:
>
> The subject has come up (again) about the PCB tools we are
> using and if they are the best-in-class performance wise.
> We've been using Mentor's Board Station (plus their schematic
> capture and simulation tools) for about 8 years now.
>
> Some of our top brass is questioning our choice of Mentor.
>
> My questions are these: Has anybody done a recent and fair
> comparison of all the PCB layout tools available? What is
> best for speed? One person here claims that some outside
> CAD houses can translate from Mentor's schematic to another
> tool, layout the board, and translate back to Mentor saving
> two weeks of layout time in the process. Can this be true?
> Our critical buzzword these days is "TIME TO MARKET",
> tool cost being secondary. Should we switch to PADS Power PCB
> or some similar NT based tool? Assuming everyone is past any
> learning curves, are there honest comparisons available for
> speed of both schematic capture and PCB layout? Is there
> a "Consumer Reports" publication for engineering tools?
>
> Any comments would be appreciated.
>
> Chris
>
> --
> ========================================================
> Chris Otis MS-217 Phone 630-378-6467
> Tellabs Operations, Inc. Fax 630-378-6923
> 1000 Remington, Blvd. email [log in to unmask]
> Bolingbrook, IL 60440 http://www.tellabs.com
> ========================================================
|
|
|