TECHNET Archives

August 1998

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Subject:
From:
Mark Pozorski <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 3 Aug 1998 09:57:18 -0500
Content-Type:
multipart/mixed; boundary="simple boundary"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
"TechNet E-Mail Forum." <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (2879 bytes) , RFC822.TXT (323 bytes)

Subject: Re: [TN] HELP! Conformally coating  on no clean flux pcb

     Mike,



     I was going to ask a similar question.  We have a situation where an

     assembly house that we are looking at only has a no-clean process and

     we then need these PCB's conformally coated.  The same question came

     up about adhesion and reliability.  What I have found out  is that

     people have done test but you can't make any generalizations when it

     comes to these tests.  Different flux chemistries may or may not work

     with different coatings.  Another side of this issue is how clean are

     your raw circuit boards when they come in from your board house?  Do

     your people use rubber gloves while handling the PCB's? I doubt it.

     Human finger grease, dirt, etc, in my opinion, is worse than any flux

     residue.

     So you have to worry about that plus the flux compatibility. Give me a

     call if you want to discuss this further...



     Mark Pozorski

     Sr. Mfg. Eng.

     ADC Telecom.

     612-936-8395









______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________

Subject: [TN] HELP! Conformally coating  on no clean flux pcb

Author:  "TechNet E-Mail Forum." <[log in to unmask]>           Mike Waters

<[log in to unmask]> at Internet-Mail

Date:    8/3/98 7:12 AM





TechNet,

I need advice badly.  In our wave solder process we use no clean flux.

We have an application where the assembled pcb has to be conformally

coated to withstand up to 100% condensing humidity and 95% non

condensing humidity in ambient temp ranges from -20deg C to +85 deg. C.

A concern has come up with the long term reliability of the conformal

coating based on cleanliness of the pcb prior to spraying the silicone

or polyureathene coating (from previous posts, I am assuming silicone

will be the best of the two solutions).  It has been suggested that we

water wash the pcb after solder before application of the coatings.  The

board is double sided with larger magnetics on the component side and

includes SMT.  In your experience, has anyone had problems using no

clean flux in conjunction with silicone coatings with respect to field

reliability?



Regards,



Mike Waters

Phone:  919-767-3815

Fax:    919-767-3966



################################################################

TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c

################################################################

To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text

n the body:

To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>

To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet

################################################################

Please visit IPC's web site (http://www.ipc.org) "On-Line Services" section for

ditional information.

For technical support contact Hugo Scaramuzza at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700

t.312

################################################################












From: SMTPLOG (cc:Mail Link to SMTP Administrator) Date: Mon, 03 Aug 1998 09:57:02 -0500 Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]> To: <[log in to unmask]>,         <[log in to unmask]> Subject: cc:Mail Link to SMTP Undeliverable Message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

ATOM RSS1 RSS2