TECHNET Archives

July 1998

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Paul Gould <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Mon, 6 Jul 1998 20:13:40 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (62 lines)
Hi Rudy,

Thanks for your input. It seems like the only explanation. I remember a
similar problem from the old days with immersion gold on copper. When the pH
dropped too low in the gold solution there were orange stains on the gold
surface we called orange peel effect. Adding a little ammonia to the gold
solution made it disappear.

Best regards
-----Original Message-----
From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>; [log in to unmask]
<[log in to unmask]>
Date: 05 July 1998 15:23
Subject: Re: [TN] Au/Ni/Cu PROBLEM


>In a message dated 98-07-05 03:46:42 EDT, you write:
>
><<
> I am a PCB fabricator in the UK and when we started using the electroless
> Nickel and Immersion Gold process we noticed a curious phenomenon. If the
> panels are immersed in DI water or mains water after processing, then
> exposed to air for a minute or two before drying, the gold has reddish
brown
> stains in random areas. Although this did not seem to affect solderability
> to any noticeable extent, it was not cosmetically attractive.
>
>I would like to have an explanation for this mechanism. The immersion gold
> is 0.15 microns max (6 millionths of an inch) over 4 microns (0.00016") of
> electroless nickel. As this occurs with DI or mains water, contamination
of
> the water does not seem to be a factor, but simply exposure to air at room
> temperature when the surface is wet. >>
>
>
>Paul:
>
>Given the thiness of the EN (and Au), I would bet the problem is likely one
of
>porosity, and having some exposed Copper here and there.  And porosity
driven
>by our industry's great nemisis, galvanic corrosion, would give you exactly
>what you are seeing.
>
>Further, I would bet that thicker EN ( 2-3X) would stop the problem.
>
>Rudy Sedlak
>RD Chemical Company

################################################################
TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet 
################################################################
Please visit IPC's web site (http://www.ipc.org) "On-Line Services" section for additional information.
For technical support contact Hugo Scaramuzza at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.312
################################################################


ATOM RSS1 RSS2