Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | TechNet E-Mail Forum. |
Date: | Fri, 31 Jul 1998 15:18:45 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I would think it wise to address the problem from a chemistry standpoint
or use an alternate surface finish before going the electroplated Nickel
route. You will immediately either alienate or disqualify most of your
PCB suppliers. Using electroplate requires surface continuity (unless
you're fortunate enough to have a design that is internally bussed, very
unlikely!) so you're generally forced to do a body plate prior to
surface cu foil etch, This most likely would entail the inclusion of an
electrolytic gold flash as well because the nickel would be difficult if
not impossible to re-activate if you were trying to utilize an immersion
gold process later on. Not only will line definition suffer, you run
the risk of nickel slivers after etch, and lastly I doubt most profit
margins will warrant the additional expense of body plated gold!!
################################################################
TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe: SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
To unsubscribe: SIGNOFF TechNet
################################################################
Please visit IPC's web site (http://www.ipc.org) "On-Line Services" section for additional information.
For technical support contact Hugo Scaramuzza at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.312
################################################################
|
|
|