TECHNET Archives

July 1998

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Tamara Bloomer <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Mon, 20 Jul 1998 13:14:45 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (89 lines)
Auger would work well for this type of system.  There are no overlap peaks
and light elements are seen with excellent results.  Depth profiling should
determine if the P is on the surface or a sub surface barrier layer.




At 01:17 AM 7/20/98 -0400, you wrote:
>     Below is a question about solderability of electroless nickel.
>
>
>______________________________ Forward Header
>__________________________________
>Subject: Analysis
>Author:  Edwin Louis at cmd-cs4-cc-p
>Date:    7/10/98 3:52 AM
>
>
>     Dan, here is the message I was trying to send to Peter.
>
>
>______________________________ Forward Header
>__________________________________
>Subject: Analysis
>Author:  Edwin Louis at cmd-cs4-cc-p
>Date:    7/10/98 3:03 AM
>
>
>     Peter we have some electroless nickel on aluminum in which  some
>times
>     you can solder to it with Sn63 and RMA flux and other times you
>     cannot. Some people have suggested that there are  various plating
>     types per various specs. that incorporate higher or lower amounts
>of
>     phosphorus. The high phosphorus containing plating presumedly do
>not
>     solder as well as the lower content plating. Another difference I
>     understand is that sometimes there are impurities of organics that
>     interfere with the soldering or perhaps heavy metal impurities that
>
>     interfere with solderability. We would like to analyze and compare
>the
>     two types of plating for these impurities. What do you suggest and
>for
>     how many dollars?
>        It appears after conversation with Dan Sostak that perhaps Auger
>     would be best because phosphorus probably migrates to the surface
>as
>     do organics. Because of the surface soldering process the culprits
>are
>     probably on the surface. As far as trace included organics are co
>     ncerned, will microscopic FTIR fit the bill? I would appreciate
>some
>     guidance from you on this matter.
>
>################################################################
>TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
>################################################################
>To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following
text in the body:
>To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
>To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet
>################################################################
>Please visit IPC's web site (http://www.ipc.org) "On-Line Services" section
for additional information.
>For technical support contact Hugo Scaramuzza at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.312
>################################################################
>
>
Tamara E. Bloomer
Assistant Scientist
Ames Laboratory
137 Wilhelm Hall
Ames, IA  50011
(515) 294-2564

################################################################
TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet 
################################################################
Please visit IPC's web site (http://www.ipc.org) "On-Line Services" section for additional information.
For technical support contact Hugo Scaramuzza at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.312
################################################################


ATOM RSS1 RSS2