Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | TechNet E-Mail Forum. |
Date: | Thu, 30 Jul 1998 12:47:50 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Matthew Park wrote:
>
> (regarding component data sheets)
>
> I think not, component manufacturers are good at making
> components and not so for recommending land patterns for their
> components. They don't count in everything that goes on to
> solder a simple SMT comp from the begining to the end.
Here, Here!
I totally agree with Mr Park on this, we call spec-
sheet footprints "generic", to be counted on only as
far as knowing the part can be attached. Fine for
1-100pc product life, usually manual methods.
In our view, the next step of footprint qualification
is "broad concensus" like IPC-SM-782, or maybe SMT Plus;
next highest qualification being "narrow concensus"
as seen in some larger OEMs (with a limited number of
factories), highest being "factory specific" such as
the major contract manufacturers and vertical OEMs will
create.
Seperating the many voices on the topic of footprints
into these categories has helped us immensely in under-
standing the chaos.
Regards to all,
--
Jeff Seeger Applied CAD Knowledge Inc
Chief Technical Officer Tyngsboro, MA 01879
jseeger "at" appliedcad "dot" com 978 649 9800
################################################################
TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe: SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
To unsubscribe: SIGNOFF TechNet
################################################################
Please visit IPC's web site (http://www.ipc.org) "On-Line Services" section for additional information.
For technical support contact Hugo Scaramuzza at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.312
################################################################
|
|
|