TECHNET Archives

June 1998

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Colin Weber <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Wed, 1 Jul 1998 13:58:55 +1000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
Folks,

I have been reviewing comments from past emails to the Technet forum
w.r.t. gold finishes on edge connectors.

I have concluded I should not require a nickel barrier for my application.
This could be qualified by noting the board will not be used in harsh
environments or be inserted more than several times in it's lifetime.

However I am still left wondering about the thickness of the hard gold
finish. In the past I have specified, for Class3, 1.3um. However, the
product shall be used in a class 2 environment.

Are there any disadvantages in using 1.3um (particularly since the IPC
standards state 0.8um for class 2), apart from cost?

Regards,

Colin Weber

################################################################
TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet 
################################################################
Please visit IPC's web site (http://www.ipc.org) "On-Line Services" section for additional information.
For technical support contact Hugo Scaramuzza at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.312
################################################################


ATOM RSS1 RSS2