TECHNET Archives

June 1998

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Hitchcock, Darren" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Tue, 30 Jun 1998 10:25:23 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (59 lines)
Tony,

I'm sure all fabricators and assemblers have a minimum fabrication
requirement that is controlled by that company.  However, there is
nothing wrong with good concise communication.  You can expect to get
what you ask for, but if you don't ask for a specific minimum
requirement, you'll never know what you will get.  If you specify the
requirement, you can expect all fabricators to meet the same minimum
standards.

I recommend specifying your acceptability requirements on the print as
it relates to an industry standard (like IPC-xxxx).  This is the best
way to communicate your requirements to the fabricator.  Many of our
customers also have "customer specifications" that they use to
communicate general requirements so that the print doesn't become
cluttered with notes.  In these "customer specifications" they detail
how their requirements relate to an industry standard and also include
"unless otherwise specified on the fabrication drawing or purchase
order" clauses.  These include packaging requirements,  default
acceptability requirements (ie: IPC-6011/6012 class 2), etc.  In this
case, you should put a note on the print stating that the board or
assembly should be manufactured to meet the requirements of your
customer specification.

In all cases, the fabrication drawing should have a note describing the
acceptability requirement either by industry standard or customer
specification.

Darren Hitchcock
Merix Corporation


> ----------
> From:         arrigo.tony[SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent:         Tuesday, June 30, 1998 9:32 AM
> Subject:      PWB Procurement Recommendations
> 
> Can anyone tell me what is gained by specifying "Fabricate to
> Mil-PRF-31032 vs. IPC-xxx?"  Is a  fabrication specification even
> required when purchasing a multi-layer PWB at all?   Will all PWB
> manufactures give some minimum fabrication requirement if none is
> stated on the drawing or in the purchase order, or is it  always BUYER
> BEWARE??
> Thanks for your assistance. 
> Tony Arrigo 
> 

################################################################
TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet 
################################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://jefry.ipc.org/forum.htm) for additional information.
For technical support contact Hugo Scaramuzza at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.312
################################################################


ATOM RSS1 RSS2