TECHNET Archives

June 1998

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
George Franck <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Tue, 2 Jun 1998 11:56:14 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
Technetters,
What were the reliability studies used to support the negative etchback
requirements of IPC-6012 Figure 3-5?
Is a .0005" inch negative etchback acceptable for all class three
applications, when etchback is not specified?
Are there documented reliability gains when etchback is required on boards?



George Franck
Raytheon Systems
Falls Church Virginia
"My Opinions are just that."

################################################################
TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet 
################################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://jefry.ipc.org/forum.htm) for additional information.
For technical support contact Hugo Scaramuzza at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.312
################################################################


ATOM RSS1 RSS2