TECHNET Archives

June 1998

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Tim Frigon <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Wed, 24 Jun 1998 14:50:34 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
I have recently gone to work with a company who is doing SMA assembly to
PWB's which have gold plated traces and pads.  This is a historical concept
as we have both ceramic and PWB substrates.  In some products, there is
direct wirebonding to the pads, and hence some thick gold plating is
required.  However, if there is no wirebonding to the board, is there any
other reason this would be preferable to conventional lead/tin plating?  I
would like to change the solder process from using a 2% silver solder used
as a result of the gold plating to a conventional Sn63 eutectic solder as a
guard against disturbed connections.  Secondarily, what is the chemical
action which makes the 2% silver solder more effective on gold plating?

################################################################
TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet 
################################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://jefry.ipc.org/forum.htm) for additional information.
For technical support contact Hugo Scaramuzza at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.312
################################################################


ATOM RSS1 RSS2