TECHNET Archives

June 1998

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Rob Schetty <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Fri, 5 Jun 1998 16:57:00 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (80 lines)
Thanks for the clarification Steve, yes, I mean reliability issues.
Rob Schetty
-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen R. Gregory <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Friday, June 05, 1998 3:27 PM
Subject: Re: [TN] Components - Exposed Cu on Component Lead Ends


>In a message dated 6/5/98 11:15:10 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
>[log in to unmask] writes:
>
>>
>>  Can anyone direct me to a technical reference detailing the work done to
>>  show that exposed copper on component lead ends do not pose a
solderability
>>  problem?
>>
>>  I've searched the Technet Archives but only found vague references to a
>>  Battelle paper with no further details.
>>
>>  Thanks in advance for any responses.
>>
>>  Rob Schetty
>>  LeaRonal Inc
>>  Freeport NY  USA
>
>Hi Rob,
>
>     Don't you mean exposed copper on lead ends doesn't pose a RELIABILITY
>problem? Because it definately poses a solderability problem. Many times
when
>the cut and form is done on QFP devices, the toe of the leads will have
>exposed copper that solder has a difficult time wetting to...sometimes it
>will, and sometimes it won't. But it's not a problem.
>
>      I've read a few articles in SMT magazine before where there's been
>stress testing performed on leads that had toe fillets and ones that
didn't,
>there was no appreciable difference in the strength or reliability of the
>joint between the two. The article I remember was written by two engineers
>from Micron.
>
>      Also in J-STD-001B on page 18, paragraph 9.2.5.3 it states: Exposed
>Basis Metal - Incomplete solder wetting at the tip of through-hole
component
>leads, and the edges and/or periphery of printed board lands and conductors
is
>acceptable. Exposed basis metal on component lead ends is permissible.
>
>-Steve Gregory-
>
>################################################################
>TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
>################################################################
>To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following
text in the body:
>To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
>To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet
>################################################################
>Please visit IPC web site (http://jefry.ipc.org/forum.htm) for additional
information.
>For technical support contact Hugo Scaramuzza at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.312
>################################################################
>
>

################################################################
TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet 
################################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://jefry.ipc.org/forum.htm) for additional information.
For technical support contact Hugo Scaramuzza at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.312
################################################################


ATOM RSS1 RSS2