Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 19 Jun 1998 09:02:13 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Don Vischulis wrote:
>
> Tom:
>
> I've never tried to plate solder over nickel, but nickel does passivate rapidly when exposed to
> air. Back when hand lines were used for plating nickel/gold edge connectors, it was well known
> that the nickel plate had to be activated by a dip into 10% to 15% sulfuric acid. In your case,
> I'd recommend attempting to activate the nickel with an acid compatible with your plating bath
> (usually fluorboric or sulfonic depending on your bath). A 2 to 3 minute immersion in the acid
> followed by a quick rinse and into the solder bath. Given that sulfuric is normally supplied at
> 98% to 96% and the others are considerably weaker, you might have to experiment with the
> concentration.
>
> As I recall, the reason for acid activation between nickel and gold plating was removal of the
> organics used in the nickel bath as well as the prevention of oxidation. If the activation step
> was inadequate, the gold would plate the tabs, but the end product would fail a tape test.
>
> Don Vischulis
> [log in to unmask]
>
> Tom Bresnan wrote:
>
> > All:
> >
> > Is there a preferred nickel I should be trying to plate solder on top
> > of? We're struggling with plating tin lead on top of nickel and it's
> > subsequent reflow after soldermask. Anyone have any suggestions? We're
> > seeing dewetting and I'm wondering how many others out there are
> > trying to do this. We currently use a nickel sulfamate bath, if that
> > has any bearing... I'm not sure of activators and such, but if you
> > think it's important, I'll find them.
> >
> > Thanks in advance all...
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Tom Bresnan
> > [log in to unmask]
> >
> > PS. Please respond direct to me as well as to the forum. I'm presently
> > disconnected from the service.
>
> snip--------------------------
>
> ################################################################
> TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
> ################################################################
> To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
> To subscribe: SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
> To unsubscribe: SIGNOFF TechNet
> ################################################################
> Please visit IPC web site (http://jefry.ipc.org/forum.htm) for additional information.
> For technical support contact Hugo Scaramuzza at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.312
> ################################################################
Solder plating over nickel.....
This is very unusual and tin component of solder will not diffuse
to Nickel to create metallic interface bond and non-wetting will
happened while reflow.
Instad of Nickel , use TIN-NICKEL plating and then solder plating
and reflow. Problem will be minimised.There must be good judgement
for solder platig and reflow technics. Wish you best of luck...
Fulabhai Patel
[log in to unmask]
################################################################
TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe: SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
To unsubscribe: SIGNOFF TechNet
################################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://jefry.ipc.org/forum.htm) for additional information.
For technical support contact Hugo Scaramuzza at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.312
################################################################
|
|
|