TECHNET Archives

June 1998

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Subject:
From:
Phil Bavaro <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 26 Jun 1998 18:13:04 -0700
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative; boundary="============_-1313212504==_ma============"
Reply-To:
"TechNet E-Mail Forum." <[log in to unmask]>, Phil Bavaro <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (838 bytes) , text/enriched (1025 bytes)
I recently came across a group of board design engineers who insist that
press fit connectors are more reliable than thru hole soldered connectors.

Given all of the assemblies wavesoldered out in the field that haven't
failed, I have a hard time giving press fit a higher reliability rating.

Does anyone have conclusive data that documents this?

I realize that this assumes a board and process which meets all of the
required specs and the materials are all of acceptable quality.

A second question I have is what happens when the board is changed from
HASL to OSP.

Does the press fit hole size have to change, and does the OSP act like a
lubricant the same way that the solder in the hole has?


All comments are welcomed.

Phillip A. Bavaro
QUALCO/\/\/\/\  Incorporated
Senior Manufacturing Engineer
[log in to unmask]
Tel (619) 658-2542
Fax (619) 658-1584


ATOM RSS1 RSS2