TECHNET Archives

June 1998

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
X-To:
"Kasprzak, Bill (esd) US" <[log in to unmask]>, Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 24 Jun 1998 11:58:39 -0400
Reply-To:
"TechNet E-Mail Forum." <[log in to unmask]>, Karl Sweitzer <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Karl Sweitzer <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Organization:
Image Acquisition Systems http://www.kodak.com/cgsHome/ias.shtml
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (48 lines)
Bill,

I have seen the issue that Werner wrote about on many programs, that
is, the manufacturing and or test environments can be much more
damaging than the use environment.  This is why one should design (as
well as perform a reliability analysis) for the whole life cycle.
When you perform this life cycle analysis, you can tabulate the damage
for each life cycle segment.  This approach to fatigue analysis was
used very successfully on the Air Force F22 as part of the Avionics
Integrity Program (AVIP for short).

On a recent LEO commercial imaging electronics system that I worked on
I was able to show our customer that the testing environments consumed
over 80% of the total life cycle fatigue damage for some components.
I was only able to do this after requesting that the customer gave me
a detailed "day in the life" thermal profile of the satellite
environment so that I could compare the on orbit fatigue damage to the
test environment damage.  I choose to use an elastic plastic total
strain approach to compare the low cycle (about 20 cycles) fatigue
damage caused by the test environment with the relatively high cycle
(about 40,000 cycles over 7 years) fatigue damage caused by the orbit
environment.

With this data we were then able to negotiate a reasonable number of
test cycles that could "screen out" infant moralities while not
forcing a design that would require expensive materials.

Please reply (personally or to TechNet) with any comments or further
questions.

--
Karl Sweitzer                     voice: 716.47.77546
Eastman Kodak Company             pager: 716.25.33681
800 Lee Road                        fax: 716.47.77293
Rochester, NY 14650-3118         mailto:[log in to unmask]

################################################################
TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet 
################################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://jefry.ipc.org/forum.htm) for additional information.
For technical support contact Hugo Scaramuzza at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.312
################################################################


ATOM RSS1 RSS2