I second Ralph's feeling and suggestion. We have exactly the same problem
here in Lockheed Martin Missiles and Space. Thank you Ralph.
David Ma
Materials and Processes
> ----------
> From: Dieffenbacher, William C
> Reply To: [log in to unmask]
> Sent: Thursday, May 21, 1998 1:40 PM
> To: EPI_Exploder
> Subject: pwb-cca : FW: [TN] IPC Specs
>
> Interesting commentary below. I'm sure most of us can relate to it.
>
> Bill Dieffenbacher
>
> > ----------
> > From: Kane, Joseph
> > Sent: Thursday, May 21, 1998 4:12 PM
> > To: Burke, James F; Dieffenbacher, William C
> > Subject: FW: [TN] IPC Specs
> >
> >
> >
> > ----------
> > From: Vaughan, Ralph H[SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> > Reply To: TechNet E-Mail Forum.;Vaughan, Ralph H
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 1998 4:40 PM
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: [TN] IPC Specs
> >
> > Greeting,
> >
> > I will be the first to commend ipc for all the good work that they do
> > for us, but I gotta say that the practice of obsoleting specs and
> > replacing with new, renumbered documents is making me long for the old
> > mil-spec days where specs NEVER changed (I never thought I'd say that).
> > Not too long ago, after much spec comparison and analysis, we convinced
> > our government customers that it would be prudent to move from
> > Mil-P-55110 to the IPC-RB-276. In the time it took to get the new
> > drawing callout approved, re-train the pwb designers and revise their
> > guidelines, and bring our stellar board suppliers up to speed (no small
> > task), RB-276 had been superceded by the 6012 document. Now I just
> > learn today that IPC-D-275 is superceded by another document. This
> > kills efforts to streamline and standardize documentation systems.
> > Also, when these continuous changes take place, it would be convenient
> > to have a detailed side paper published explaining all the changes (and
> > maybe why the changes were made). May be a lot to ask, but it would
> > keep every user from doing it individually.
> >
> > Anyone else see this as a problem?
> >
> > That's all the whining for now.
> >
> > Ralph
> >
> > ################################################################
> > TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV
> 1.8c
> > ################################################################
> > To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with
> > following text in the body:
> > To subscribe: SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
> > To unsubscribe: SIGNOFF TechNet
> > ################################################################
> > Please visit IPC web site (http://jefry.ipc.org/forum.htm) for
> additional
> > information.
> > For technical support contact Hugo Scaramuzza at [log in to unmask] or
> > 847-509-9700 ext.312
> > ################################################################
> >
> >
> ========================================================================
> Help regarding Majordomo:
> http://www.epic.lmco.com/Majordomo/Docs/majordomo.basic.html
> Archives for this list:
> http://www.epic.lmco.com/Majordomo/Archives/pwb-cca
> PWB/CCA homepage: http://www.epic.lmco.com/Mechanical/Subcouncil/pwb_cca
> ========================================================================
>
################################################################
TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe: SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
To unsubscribe: SIGNOFF TechNet
################################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://jefry.ipc.org/forum.htm) for additional information.
For technical support contact Hugo Scaramuzza at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.312
################################################################
|
