Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | TechNet E-Mail Forum. |
Date: | Thu, 21 May 1998 08:19:49 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I'd rather see the revision of doc's than new numbers. I appreciate the
current updates, but why change the numbers??
-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Buetow <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wednesday, May 20, 1998 5:24 PM
Subject: Re: [TN] IPC Specs
>Ralph,
>
>Thanks for your note. This is a valid question, although I assume that when
you say
>mil specs "never" changed, it's because the numbers didn't change, not the
actual
>contents. After all, MIL-PRF-55110 is now at F revision.
>
>I would like to point out that IPC-RB-276 was published in 1992, and not
superseded
>until 1997, and that IPC-D-275, published in 1991, wasn't superseded until
1998.
>That's a lot of time between revisions. In fact, we frequently hear from
industry
>that the standards don't keep up with the technology.
>
################################################################
TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe: SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
To unsubscribe: SIGNOFF TechNet
################################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://jefry.ipc.org/forum.htm) for additional information.
For technical support contact Hugo Scaramuzza at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.312
################################################################
|
|
|