TECHNET Archives

May 1998

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Matthew Sanders <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Fri, 15 May 1998 19:29:32 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
Hello,

I've been seeing boards from some fab vendors recently that have non
wetting of the HAL finish on copper surfaces. Now, according to IPC-6012
(3.5.4.6), if the non wetting is on non soldered surfaces, which is the
case with my boards, 1% of conductor surfaces can have exposed Cu for
class 3. If you count each of the holes we have twice (once for each
side), we have less than that percentage. I'm still not very comfortable
with this, though, so I was hoping someone could tell me the
ramifications of exposed Cu in finished assemblies; it seems like it'd
potentially be a reliability problem potentially. Can someone shed some
light on this?

Thanks,
Matt Sander

Matthew Sanders
PWB Procurement Engineer, Trimble Navigation Limited
[log in to unmask]
Phone: (408) 481-7817
Fax: (408) 481-8590

################################################################
TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet 
################################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://jefry.ipc.org/forum.htm) for additional information.
For technical support contact Hugo Scaramuzza at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.312
################################################################


ATOM RSS1 RSS2