TECHNET Archives

May 1998

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Wally Doeling (wallyd)" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Wed, 13 May 1998 16:37:03 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (191 lines)
         The PPT process is very useful for controlling solder deposits
especially on fine pitch and micro-BGA parts as well as on very fine designs
used for direct chip attach using a CC-4 approach.
        This process provides a very defined volume of solder which cannot be
accomplished by normal stencil printing and if that is your goal, I think
that the economics work out very well.  The cost is a lot less than you will
get with other
solder deposit methods I have looked at!

        Contact: JoAnne DeBlis
                714-557-3383

        [log in to unmask]


        -----Original Message-----
        From:   Paul Klasek [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
        Sent:   Wednesday, May 13, 1998 3:45 PM
        To:     [log in to unmask]
        Subject:        Re: [TN] HASL alternatives

        Scott
        The PPT is formed with a mesh process ; leaving the checkered imprint
on
        the surface ; supposedly keeping the flux in place .
        You still pay for the stencil ; only shift the process to bare board
.
        The polished rollers process sounds intriguing .
        I've send a reply to this topic few moths back ; it'll be in files ,
        incl. the contacts .
        From cost , no clean , double sided application , ( you do need a
reflow
        with chiller of bottom side ), etc. , it is impractical for most of
the
        assy spectrum . Very limiting and complex on the mix TH & SMD as well
.
        There are better and cheaper ways how eliminate stencil process ,
        pending the application .

        See you                 paul ; ResMed

        >----------
        >From:  Lolmaugh, Scott (AZ15)[SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
        >Sent:  Thursday, 14 May 1998 0:15
        >To:    [log in to unmask]
        >Subject:       Re: [TN] HASL alternatives
        >
        >All,
        >There was an interesting article in the February issue of SMT
Magazine
        >(IHS Publishing Group) on page 56, entitled: "End Paste Defects with
        >Solid Solder Deposits".  This is a technique where the PWB
Manufacturer
        >applies solder to the board, then runs the boards through polished
        >rollers to flatten the solder coating into a flat surface roughly
the
        >same height as the soldermask.  Then a tacky flux is applied and
finally
        >an easy peel cover sheet.  They claim the boards retain
solderability
        >well and the paste stencil process is eliminated.
        >
        >There have been similar / identical techniques touted in the past,
known
        >as:
        >"Sipad" (R) Siemens AG, (solderpaste application method)
        >"Optipad" (R) Viele Circuits Inc. and Burkle USA, (liquid solder
        >application method) and
        >"Precision Pad Technology or PPT (R) Mask Technology Inc.
(solderpaste
        >application w/ textured finish)
        >
        >If anyone knows of domestic (USA) Manufacturers offering this
technology,
        >I'd like to hear who they are.
        >Thanks
        >Best Regards,
        >Scott Lolmaugh
        >SMT Production Engineering
        >Honeywell IAC, Inc.
        >602.313.3551 /FAX: 3402 (Please call first)
        >
        >
        > -----Original Message-----
        >From: [log in to unmask]
        >Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 1998 8:39 AM
        >To: [log in to unmask]
        >Subject: [TN] HASL alternatives
        >
        >To All,
        >We are now making a comparison between different alternatives to
HASL.
        >The
        >chosen alternative will have to meet the following criterias
criterias.
        >
        > - flat coating
        > - compatible with No-clean process and mixed technology
        > - resistant to 2-3 reflow (multiple heat cycle)
        > -and MINIMUM 1 year shelf life (storage before assembly)
        >
        >These are the alternatives we think can meet our needs:
        >
        >* OSP
        >        - Benzimidazole (?)
        >
        >* IMMERSION
        >        - Silver
        >        - Bismuth
        >        - Au-Ni
        >        - Palladium
        >
        >
        >Q: Wich one do you think could be the best meet to our criterias ?
        >
        >Q: And what would be its advantage(s) compared to the others ?
        >
        >Q:  OTHERS  ? (is anyone using other coating alternative )
        >
        >
        >Thanks for all for your help
        >
        >
        >Nicolas van der Heyden
        >
        >################################################################
        >TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using
LISTSERV
        >1.8c
        >################################################################
        >To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with
        >following
        > text in the body:
        >To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
        >To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet
        >################################################################
        >Please visit IPC web site (http://jefry.ipc.org/forum.htm) for
additional
        > information.
        >For the technical support contact Dmitriy Sklyar at [log in to unmask]
or
        > 847-509-9700 ext.311
        >################################################################
        >
        >################################################################
        >TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using
LISTSERV 1.8c
        >################################################################
        >To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with
following
        >text in the body:
        >To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
        >To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet
        >################################################################
        >Please visit IPC web site (http://jefry.ipc.org/forum.htm) for
additional
        >information.
        >For the technical support contact Dmitriy Sklyar at [log in to unmask]
or
        >847-509-9700 ext.311
        >################################################################
        >
        >

        ################################################################
        TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV
1.8c
        ################################################################
        To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with
following text in the body:
        To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
        To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet
        ################################################################
        Please visit IPC web site (http://jefry.ipc.org/forum.htm) for
additional information.
        For the technical support contact Dmitriy Sklyar at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.311
        ################################################################

################################################################
TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet 
################################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://jefry.ipc.org/forum.htm) for additional information.
For the technical support contact Dmitriy Sklyar at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.311
################################################################


ATOM RSS1 RSS2