Content-Type: |
text/plain |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 1 May 1998 15:03:27 -0500 |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
X-To: |
|
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
See IPC-2222 10.3
It says large areas may/shall/should be croshatched. Three diff
paragraphs with three diff words. Unless I misunderstand it even
INTERNAL areas should be broken up. Anybody out there worrying about
that?
George W Uptain, Jr.
Austin Product Center of Schlumberger Oilfield Services
(512)331-3183
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Davis Ben [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Friday, May 01, 1998 2:47 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [DC] Solid vs. Hatch
>
> Greetings fellow designers...
>
> I'm having a bit of trouble explaining the reasoning behind using
> hatch
> fill vs. solid fill on outer layers. I have, in the dark recesses of
> my
> brain, a memory of a rule of thumb saying to hatch any fill areas
> larger
> than 1 sq. inch. I believe this was to prevent sucking too much heat
> during the soldering process, sucking too much solder during wave
> soldering (in uncoated use), and/or to prevent warping of the board.
>
> We currently have a board approx. 6x5 inches, predominately fill
> (chassis ground) on the secondary side. We are using soldermask over
> bare copper on this 2-sided, .062, FR4 board.. The previous
> incarnation
> of this board was somewhat smaller and used solid fill with no
> problems. Now I find myself trying to defend my choice of using hatch
> fill on the new board. Perhaps my "rule of thumb" is no longer valid
> or
> was a myth originally. It is easy convince others about the sucking
> up
> solder when uncoated issue, but since we have SMOBC they don't see
> this
> as a problem. Are the warping and heat sinking issues valid? Are
> there
> other issues/concerns I should address or use in my defense? On the
> other hand, I don't mind if I'm wrong - solid/hatch is just a button
> push away!!!
>
> Thanks for any assistance you can provide.
>
> Ben Davis
> Systems & Electronics, Inc.
> [log in to unmask]
>
> ################################################################
> DesignerCouncil E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using
> LISTSERV 1.8c
> ################################################################
> To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with
> following text in the body:
> To subscribe: SUBSCRIBE DesignerCouncil <your full name>
> To unsubscribe: SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil
> ################################################################
> Please visit IPC web site (http://jefry.ipc.org/forum.htm) for
> additional information.
> For the technical support contact Dmitriy Sklyar at [log in to unmask] or
> 847-509-9700 ext.311
> ################################################################
################################################################
DesignerCouncil E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe: SUBSCRIBE DesignerCouncil <your full name>
To unsubscribe: SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil
################################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://jefry.ipc.org/forum.htm) for additional information.
For the technical support contact Dmitriy Sklyar at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.311
################################################################
|
|
|