TECHNET Archives

April 1998

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Tue, 28 Apr 1998 10:06:38 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (61 lines)
Black or brown oxide will provide better bonding strength than Cu surface
due to it's topography.  However it is cupric oxide that is black, CuO and
cuprous, brown Cu2O.  Cupric is is the original, sensitive to an acid
attack,demonstrated by the pink ring, cuprous is the reduced one, more
resistant to an acid attack.  Some of the newer theories claim that brown
oxide actually contains fully reduced Cu.

Regards,

Paul

>Olson, Jack C wrote:-
>>I was under the impression that black oxide provided more "tooth" for
>>bonding copper to the substrate material.  Recently I was told is was just
>>to protect the surface during handling. Since I can't find it in Coombs
>>Handbook, can anyone briefly explain?
>Hi Jack
>You are right, the reason for oxide treat of copper foil is to improve
>the bond strength. It makes handling more difficult as it is easily
>marked. Early oxides were cuprous and readily attacked by acids. They
>could also be quite thick and hence led to pink ring phenomenon around
>holes. Nowadays the norm is to reduce the oxide coating to cupric by
>post treatment. This is impervious to acid attack and is also much
>thinner which prevents pink ring formation.
>There are alternative finishes but, as far as I know, none of them give
>higher bond strengths than reduced oxide.
>Paul Gould
>[log in to unmask]
>Teknacron Circuits Ltd
>Fax: 1983 865141
>Tel: 1983 866531
>
>################################################################
>TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
>################################################################
>To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following
text in the body:
>To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
>To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet
>################################################################
>Please visit IPC web site (http://jefry.ipc.org/forum.htm) for additional
information.
>For the technical support contact Dmitriy Sklyar at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.311
>################################################################
>
>
>

################################################################
TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet 
################################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://jefry.ipc.org/forum.htm) for additional information.
For the technical support contact Dmitriy Sklyar at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.311
################################################################


ATOM RSS1 RSS2