Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | TechNet E-Mail Forum. |
Date: | Thu, 2 Apr 1998 08:58:27 PST |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Dear Ken,
I noticed you subsribe to TechNet as well. If you find it more convenient to reach me by E-Mail. My E-Mail address is [log in to unmask]
Please let me know if I can be of further assistance with your conformal coating issue.
Best regards,
Dave Rund
Taiyo America, Inc.
----------
> We have a problem which I suspect many of you have encountered and
> satisfactorily solved. Most of our PCB assemblies are through-hole, double
> sided or multi-layered.
>
> We have a relatively small but persistent percentage of boards that exit
> the flow solder process with solder bridges between adjacent
> (clipped/clinched) leads on the circuit side of the board. Visual
> examination of the bridges typically reveals them to be between leads
> which are not bent toward each other.
>
> This phenomenon has been accepted as part of our normal process along with
> the subsequent touch up operation which removes the shorts. I invite you
> to comment on the following two hypotheses and to add any diagnoses and
> successful corrective actions you may have taken.
>
> --The tin-lead solder ration may sufficiently differ from the eutectic
> point that the solder remains in the "semi-plastic" state too long when the
> board exits the wave and cools before the bridging material can exit the
> surface.
>
> --The preheat temperature may be too low--especially with multi-layer
> boards having heat sinking ground planes so that too rapid cooling is
> induced and bridges form.
>
> I suspect many of you have theories better informed by experience. Please
> let me hear from you. I am on a team tasked with reducing our fairy
> extensive after-wave touch-up operation.
>
> PS: I thank each of you who replied to my request for resolving a
> conformal coating over LPI solder mask non-wetting and dewetting problem.
> Each of your suggestions was enlightening and helpful. Much testing has
> determined that the problem is some still unidentified contaminant on the
> silk-screened side only, which can be removed by a sufficiently "vigorous"
> aqueous cleaning.
>
> ################################################################
> TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
> ################################################################
> To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following
> text in the body:
> To subscribe: SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
> To unsubscribe: SIGNOFF TechNet
> ################################################################
> Please visit IPC web site (http://jefry.ipc.org/forum.htm) for additional
> information.
> For the technical support contact Dmitriy Sklyar at [log in to unmask] or
> 847-509-9700 ext.311
> ################################################################
>
################################################################
TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe: SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
To unsubscribe: SIGNOFF TechNet
################################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://jefry.ipc.org/forum.htm) for additional information.
For the technical support contact Dmitriy Sklyar at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.311
################################################################
|
|
|