TECHNET Archives

March 1998

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Hurst, Joe" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Mon, 30 Mar 1998 14:18:00 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines)
Hello Folks:


Since I often design PWBs having controlled impedances, the question
often arises as to what value to use for the relative permittivity (Er)
of FR4 material.

1. Some consultants have said to use 4.8 for outside layers and 3.5 for
inside layers.
Impedance calculations based on these numbers give results closely
matching actual measurements.

2. Another source has said that due to the pressing process the Er
around the traces on inside layers actually is 0.5 less than the Er of
the FR4 material being used.

3. Others insist that an Er of 4.5 be used for all calculations.

Considering that these materials and processes have been around so long
the entire issue must have been settled by someone.    What are other
people using in these calculations?

 Thank You
Joe Hurst

################################################################
TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet 
################################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://jefry.ipc.org/forum.htm) for additional information.
For the technical support contact Dmitriy Sklyar at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.311
################################################################


ATOM RSS1 RSS2