TECHNET Archives

March 1998

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"J. Warhelere" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Wed, 25 Mar 1998 20:40:17 -0500
Content-Type:
MULTIPART/MIXED
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (640 bytes) , MESSAGE/RFC822 (6 kB)
Keith,

Your response (requesting other responses) is the only one received ????

Since the first e-mail there have been many interested in definitions of
Current IPC standards; but a discussion of future needs, methods,  and
demands was desired.  The IPC generated the roadmap, but what are the
hopes versus realities of the 1400+ Technetians now?   It seems to me
from the roadmap that progress will filter out those companies without
interest?  Is this a safe assumption?

I will resubmit this to the group once again.  The original inquiry was
copied below by Keith.

Thanks,  Maybe this was overlooked ... here goes again ...

J. (Yelloweagle) Warhelere


ATOM RSS1 RSS2