TECHNET Archives

March 1998

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Furrow, Robert Gordon (Robert)" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Mon, 23 Mar 1998 09:50:42 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (64 lines)
Jim,
We also have experienced similar problems. As the board goes through the
wave, the solder joints heat at slightly different rates depending on
design considerations. For example all the pads may go out to vias, but
each trace to the via may have different lengths. Some pads will thus go
to liquidus before others. The cooler pads now have all the stresses
from the part and also are very weak since they are also near liquidus.
These pads then pull away at the weakest area which at this point is
right at the pad / solder joint interface. Once the part cools the
fracture is still present but it is nearly impossible to see and could
even be making physical contact with the pad such that the device passes
In Circuit Test. Obviously this is a serious reliability concern. It can
be resolved by optimizing wave temperature, contact time, preheat, etc.
and by making sure the designs do not promote excessive or differential
conduction of heat to the topside pads.

Robert Furrow
Lucent Technologies

>----------
>From:  Jim Gryga[SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
>Sent:  Friday, March 20, 1998 2:21 PM
>To:    [log in to unmask]
>Subject:       [TN] Secondary reflow during wave
>
>I have a board with a 208 pin QFP top side.  During the wave process the
>QFP lead at its solder joint reaches 178 degrees C.  Eutectic solder
>reflows at 183 degrees C so the joints should not be reaching molten state
>and visual observation at least confirms that.  What is an acceptable high
>end temperature for these joints to see before the joint is degraded to the
>point of being a reliability risk?  Are there any empiracle tests that  can
>be used to determine the degradation of the joint if any is taking place?
>
>Jim Gryga
>
>################################################################
>TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
>################################################################
>To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following
>text in the body:
>To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
>To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet
>################################################################
>Please visit IPC web site (http://jefry.ipc.org/forum.htm) for additional
>information.
>For the technical support contact Dmitriy Sklyar at [log in to unmask] or
>847-509-9700 ext.311
>################################################################
>
>
>

################################################################
TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet 
################################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://jefry.ipc.org/forum.htm) for additional information.
For the technical support contact Dmitriy Sklyar at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.311
################################################################


ATOM RSS1 RSS2