TECHNET Archives

March 1998

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Rob Schetty <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Tue, 3 Mar 1998 14:36:03 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (80 lines)
Ed,

     The only spec. I've seen on this subject is a Military Spec.  although
others might be out there.

    MIL-M-38510H specifies that "tin-lead plating shall have in the plated
deposit two percent to 50 percent by weight lead (balance nominally tin)."

    This spec. originated as a way to ensure whisker-free components, as 2%
Pb was found to be the safe minimum percentage to stop tin whisker growth.
Today, most external lead plating operations plate a Sn-Pb composition in
the range of 80-20 to 90-10.

    The thinking behind not plating eutectic Sn-Pb on device leads
originated from the extended storage times which existed between plating and
the board assembly operation - as the plated component ages, some of the tin
on the lead is consumed as copper-tin intermetallic.  If eutectic Sn-Pb were
plated on the leads, you would end up with a Pb-rich component finish after
storage, which is undesirable.  So to be on the safe side, most plating is
done with tin-rich alloys as mentioned above.

    Regards,

    Rob Schetty
    LeaRonal Inc.
    Freeport, NY  USA


-----Original Message-----
From: SEM Lab, Inc. <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tuesday, March 03, 1998 12:16 PM
Subject: [TN] Tin-Lead Plating Composition on Device Leads


>I would sincerely appreciate some discussion on "preferred" plating
>composition on fine pitch quad flat pack device leads from the
>standpoint of SMT manufacturing (i.e. solderability and yields).  My
>client is using what appears to be an electroplated 90Sn-10Pb
>composition.  My suggestion was to use a composition close to the
>eutecic composition (63Sn-37Pb).  Does anyone know of any IPC (or other)
>specifications that address this topic?
>
>Thanks,
>Ed
>--
>               SEM Lab, Inc.
>Scanning Electron Microscopy and Failure Analysis
>               Snohomish, WA
>               (425)335-4400
>   http://www.eskimo.com/~eriemer/SEMLab.htm
>
>################################################################
>TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
>################################################################
>To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following
text in the body:
>To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
>To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet
>################################################################
>Please visit IPC web site (http://jefry.ipc.org/forum.htm) for additional
information.
>For the technical support contact Dmitriy Sklyar at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.311
>################################################################
>
>

################################################################
TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet 
################################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://jefry.ipc.org/forum.htm) for additional information.
For the technical support contact Dmitriy Sklyar at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.311
################################################################


ATOM RSS1 RSS2