TECHNET Archives

March 1998

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jack Crawford <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Thu, 19 Mar 1998 13:46:03 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (66 lines)
Because you posted your question to more than one forum, I'm repeating the response
here

This issue has been of concern to many folks in the industry for several reasons.
When the project was proposed last fall, over 200 people from all parts of the PCB
manufacturing and assembly industry expressed interest.  Some wanted a common method
to be able to compute Defects per Million Opportunities (DPMO) at the end of the
assembly process as a means to benchmark companies against each other.  The work in
progress for this is IPC-7912 Calculation of DPMO in electronic Assembly Acceptance
Inspection.  Another group is concerned with tracking every process indicator as well
as end item defects at every step of the assembly process.  This data can be used for
SPC/CPI.  The work in progess for this is IPC-9261 Calculation of DPMO in Electronic
Assembly Operations.  The documents are in early draft stages and at the task group
meeting several weeks ago they set some ambitious goals.  The next scheduled meeting
of this group will be with our fall committee meetings at IPC-SMTA Electronics
Assembly EXPO in Providence RI October 24-29.  The task group may choose to have an
Interim Meeting later in the summer if significant progress is made on the documents,
though.  Your association's leaders for this project are Fritz Byle (Rockwell/Allen
Bradley) and Tom Olafsson (Teradyne).

Jack Crawford, IPC Project Manger - Assembly
2215 Sanders Road, Northbrook IL  60062-6135
[log in to unmask]        http://www.ipc.org
847-509-9700 x 393
fax 847-509-9798.

>>> RSIMathis <[log in to unmask]> 03/19/98 12:09PM >>>
My company is unclear as to how we should be recording and reporting defects
with our PCB assemblies.  Some think that all shorts and opens prior to touch-
up should be reported as defects, others believe we should report only defects
found after touch-up.

Questions:
1.)  How do other companies do this?
2.)  Is there an industry standard method for reporting defects?
3.)  Is there an IPC (or other organization's) standard or manual for
reporting procedures?

Thanks to all,  Jim Mathis

################################################################
TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet
################################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://jefry.ipc.org/forum.htm) for additional
information.
For the technical support contact Dmitriy Sklyar at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700
ext.311
################################################################

################################################################
TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet 
################################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://jefry.ipc.org/forum.htm) for additional information.
For the technical support contact Dmitriy Sklyar at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.311
################################################################


ATOM RSS1 RSS2