TECHNET Archives

March 1998

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Date:
Mon, 23 Mar 1998 19:50:20 -0800
Reply-To:
"TechNet E-Mail Forum." <[log in to unmask]>, "Thomas E. Waznis" <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
In-Reply-To:
Content-transfer-encoding:
7bit
From:
"Thomas E. Waznis" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
>ammoniacal etchant, is to use ORP, as you would in Cupric Chloride etching.

I have found it difficult to use ammonia or cupric for this application due to
what happens when these chemistries hit the rinse. They etch fast and don't
seem to rinse fast enough to get unifomity of the copper being left on.

Might try sulfuric-peroxide; preferably in a batch tank, not spray. I've had
this work well. We considered the larger tooth an advantage once the circuits
were etched.

################################################################
TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet 
################################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://jefry.ipc.org/forum.htm) for additional information.
For the technical support contact Dmitriy Sklyar at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.311
################################################################


ATOM RSS1 RSS2