TECHNET Archives

February 1998

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Greg Bartlett <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Greg Bartlett <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 4 Feb 1998 13:26:52 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (144 lines)
Hi Richard,

We've been using BGAs for nearly 5 years now in similar applications
(Commercial Off-The-Shelf defense and high-end commercial) with success.  We
use a variety of PBGA, CBGA, and TBGA devices.

We don't do any ICT on our boards....yet.  We've been using functional
tests and boundary scans.  From what I've heard, ICT is feasible, but the
fixturing has to be designed properly to avoid placing a large concentrated
force directly beneath the device.  I've heard stories of people breaking
solder joints with improper designs.

We really don't inspect our BGA solder joints, other than a periodic scan
of the outer row.  If your assembly process is truly controlled and you
start out with good quality PWBs, you really shouldn't need any additional
visual inspection.  X-ray is nice for process development and to check out
questionable connections, but in my opinion it shouldn't be implemented
as an in-line process.

Repairs are done fairly easily, but it does take some process development
time and a decent quality repair station.  Proper design improves rework
success rates.  Items such as device placement, rework clearance, board
stackup, dielectric material composition, and via size are some of the
factors that can influence your success.

Good luck!

Greg Bartlett
Mercury Computer Systems, Inc
Chelmsford, MA
[log in to unmask]
-----
Blanchet,Richard wrote:
>Hello,
>
>As we hear more and more about BGAs, my perception is that there's some
>issues to be improved. From a military/high-end commercial application
stand
>point, I have the following questions:
>
>1- Do people put a lot of vias under BGAs to perform ICT or do they just
>perform functional tests ?
>
>2- How do you guys inspect your BGA solder joints once on the card ?
Are
>X-ray practical and reliable in a production mode ?  What about Scanning
>Acoustic Microscopy (like a system from Sonoscan) ?
>
>3- And what about repairs ?  Are they easily done with a high success
rate ?
>
>I'm trying to learn anything I can about BGAs, so any info is welcome,
even
>the most basic ones.
>
>You can reach me off-line at [log in to unmask]
>
>Thank you.
>
>########################################################
>########
>TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV
1.8c
>########################################################
>########
>To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with
following
>text in the body:
>To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
>To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet
>########################################################
>########
>Please visit IPC web site (http://jefry.ipc.org/forum.htm) for
additional
>information.
>For the technical support contact Dmitriy Sklyar at [log in to unmask] or
>847-509-9700 ext.311
>########################################################
>########
>
>
>
>RFC822 header
>-----------------------------------
>
>Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]>
>Received: from charon.mc.com by mc.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
>       id KAA04214; Wed, 4 Feb 1998 10:50:24 -0500
>Received: from jefry.ipc.org (na-3.megsinet.net [208.150.51.11])
>       by charon.mc.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA03829
>       for <[log in to unmask]>; Wed, 4 Feb 1998 10:50:32 -0500 (EST)
>Received: from jefry (208.150.51.11) by jefry.ipc.org (LSMTP for Windows
NT
>v1.1a) with SMTP id <[log in to unmask]>; Wed, 4 Feb 1998 9:38:49
-0600
>Received: from IPC.ORG by IPC.ORG (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8c) with
spool id
>          89686 for [log in to unmask]; Wed, 4 Feb 1998 09:38:48 -0600
>Received: from simon.ipc.org by jefry.ipc.org (LSMTP for Windows NT
v1.1a) with
>          SMTP id <[log in to unmask]>; Wed, 4 Feb 1998 9:38:47
-0600
>Received: from gatekeep.marconi.ca by simon.ipc.org via SMTP
>          (940816.SGI.8.6.9/940406.SGI) for <[log in to unmask]> id
JAA11691; Wed,
>          4 Feb 1998 09:45:12 -0800
>Received: from av310a.mtl.marconi.ca by gatekeep.marconi.ca;
>          (5.65/1.1.8.2/21Sep94-0917AM) id AA10914; Wed, 4 Feb 1998
10:48:35
>          -0500
>Received: from srvsmtp (srvsmtp.mtl.marconi.ca) by av310a.mtl.marconi.ca
(PMDF
>          V5.1-8 #20942) with SMTP id
>          <[log in to unmask]> for
[log in to unmask]; Wed,
>          4 Feb 1998 10:48:06 EST
>Received: by srvsmtp with Microsoft Mail id <34D88DA4@srvsmtp>; Wed, 04
Feb
>          1998 10:47:48 -0500 (EST)
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
>Message-ID:  <34D88DA4@srvsmtp>
>Date:         Wed, 4 Feb 1998 10:46:00 -0500
>Reply-To: "\"TechNet E-Mail Forum.\" <[log in to unmask]>,
>        \"Blanchet,Richard\"" <[log in to unmask]>
>Sender: TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
>From: "Blanchet,Richard" <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject:      [TN] Assy: PBGAs
>To: [log in to unmask]
>X-UIDL: 6cd208edc4fe2c118a878e293d507d03
>

################################################################
TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet 
################################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://jefry.ipc.org/forum.htm) for additional information.
For the technical support contact Dmitriy Sklyar at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.311
################################################################


ATOM RSS1 RSS2