TECHNET Archives

February 1998

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
drilbert <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Tue, 24 Feb 1998 04:14:09 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
sam mccorkel wrote:
>
> Is there anybody out there that uses Centerline "AT" drill bits?
>
> We got a flyer claiming 14,000 hits without resharpening.
>
> Curious to see your feedback.
>

My understanding is you cannot resharpen these.  The point geometry does
allow a lot more hits than typical.  The rake angle and helix angle
create a more massive corner, and the point geometry looks like a more
efficient chip maker to me, better cutting forces, smaller deformation
zone, so less heat, less wear.  I would guess, that if you don't care
too much about nailheading, you could get many thousands of hits, but
14000?

################################################################
TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet 
################################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://jefry.ipc.org/forum.htm) for additional information.
For the technical support contact Dmitriy Sklyar at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.311
################################################################


ATOM RSS1 RSS2