TECHNET Archives

February 1998

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Edwards, Ted A (AZ75)" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Wed, 18 Feb 1998 16:45:41 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
Check the TechNet archives, there must have been 50 messages about the TSOP 
Alloy 42 solderability problem in the last year.
 ----------
From: Tom Monico
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Solderability od alloy 42
Date: Wednesday, February 18, 1998 12:15PM

Hi all,
 
We've noticed different solderability performance of alloy 42 TSOP lead 
frames vs. copper 194 lead frames on an electroless nickel/immersion gold 
SMT finish. Alloy 42 exhibits reduced solderability at lower reflow 
temperatures. However, even at 218 degrees C, the alloy 42 lead frame still 
does not yield the bond pull strength of the copper lead frame.
 
Any comments or observations would be greatly appreciated.
 
Tom Monico
MicroVia, Inc. 
 
################################################################
TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet 
################################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://jefry.ipc.org/forum.htm) for additional information.
For the technical support contact Dmitriy Sklyar at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.311
################################################################


ATOM RSS1 RSS2