TECHNET Archives

February 1998

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Paul Klasek <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Tue, 10 Feb 1998 13:49:22 +1100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (178 lines)
Ken ,
 on the dispense to screen dilemma , go with dispenser if you can ;
the control in shift sized syringes is a dream comparing with stencils
and associated consequences .
Just the skip of stencils alone , doubled material efficiency and ease
of maintenance would change your view of process .
It's incomparable .
The syringes are coming frozen, degassed, ready to use and discard .
On clean cycle you should have a pair of parts , one in use, one ready
or being cleaned .
Let me know if you go this way ; however most of the time the capital in
place dictates stencils .
Mind you for price of 100 stencils you can have a decent dispenser ;
like one of Camelot's

Paul Klasek; ResMed ; www.resmed.com

>----------
>From:  Ken Patel[SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
>Sent:  Tuesday, 10 February 1998 13:06
>To:    [log in to unmask]
>Subject:       [TN] Again-Most weird problem: Solder between epoxy & fab orepoxy
>&comp
>
>It was great to get few excellent responses to my e-mail on solder getting
>between caps and epoxy and I thank those who responded for all their help
>but I still have the following questions.
>
>(1) What is the best practice in the industry - epoxy dispense through glue
>dispenser machine or screening epoxy through stencil ?
>(2) How to control the left over epoxy after use for stencil dispensed
>epoxy?       How it is being control in the industry? stored in the jar &
>    refrigerated/use small tube/etc...
>(3) How can I confirm that entrapped flux is really a flux residue which is
>difficult see using microscope, is there any test any lab can perform
>keeping in mind that board was handled using bare hands? This test should
>    be done on localized area.
>(4) Any other useful information I should be aware off.
>
>re,
>ken patel
>
>
>At 08:00 AM 2/6/98 -0500, [log in to unmask] wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>I too have seen this problem in the past, the voids are caused by
>>outgassing of the material during cure or moisture within the adhesive or
>>in the PCB.  If you cure the glue with a fast high temperature profile, the
>>problem is more likely to occur.  For example, the adhesive can be cured
>>for 1.5 minutes at 150?C or 2.5 minutes at 125?C.  The lower temperature
>>cure is better.  Obviously you need to work with the thru-put of your
>>process, but slowing down the cure time worked for us and did not affect
>>thru-put.
>>
>>The voids in the adhesive create a path for the flux and solder (via
>>capillary action), and i have seen shorts under components from one
>>termination to the other of pure solder, or worse yet, solder under the
>>component that did not create a short, but was close enough to the
>>termination that eventually a dendritic growth occured and completed the
>>short.  HOWEVER, the main cause of the problem was that the adhesive dot
>>under the component was TOO BIG!!  After the component was placed, the
>>adhesive dot covered the entire area under the component and onto the pads.
>>When the component was wave soldered, the pad became liquid, and due to
>>capillary action, solder was sucked into the adhesive voids, thus creating
>>the short.  If you make your adhesive dot such that it does not touch the
>>pads or the end terminations then you have eliminated the path for the
>>solder, and thus no more shorts.  With this design, even if you have voids
>>in the adhesive and solder is caught in the voids, it does not stretch from
>>pad to pad.  Obviously it is best to eliminate the voids altogether.
>>
>>Consider adhesive dot design:
>>With a single dot, make sure that it does not touch the pads or
>>terminations.
>>With a dual dot design:  make sure that the dots do not touch the pads or
>>terminations.  We also had another problem with dual dots, the gap between
>>the dots also created a pathway for flux or solder.  You will find in many
>>books a suggestion to put a dummy trace between the pads.  This acts as a
>>dam.
>>
>>The adhesive could be a contributing factor.  Hereaus had similiar problems
>>(as was mentioned with Loctite), but they have new formulations(PD944) to
>>help reduce the moisture and outgassing issues.
>>
>>Ed Holton
>>Hella Electronics
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>[log in to unmask] on 02/05/98 09:02:04 PM
>>
>>Please respond to [log in to unmask]; Please respond to [log in to unmask]
>>
>>To:   [log in to unmask]
>>cc:    (bcc: Ed Holton/Hella North America Inc.)
>>Subject:  [TN] Most weird problem: Solder between epoxy & fab or epoxy &
>>      comp
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Dear Technetters,
>>
>>I have seen the most weird problem in my 7 years in PCBA manufacturing
>>environment. Solder is getting between the epoxy and component and/or
>>between fab and epoxy thus shorting it out across terminations of SMT caps.
>>
>>Does any one has seen similar problem? Any resolution? Our regular process
>>is epoxy application thr' stencil, component loading, curing and then hand
>>load & wave.
>>
>>Any help or leads will be highly appreciated.
>>
>>re,
>>ken patel
>>______________________________________________________
>>Ken Patel                       Phone:  (408) 490-6804
>>1708 McCarthy Blvd.             Fax:    (408) 490-6859
>>Milpitas, CA 95035              Beeper: (888) 769-1808
>>
>>################################################################
>>TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
>>################################################################
>>To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following
>> text in the body:
>>To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
>>To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet
>>################################################################
>>Please visit IPC web site (http://jefry.ipc.org/forum.htm) for additional
>>information. For the technical support contact Dmitriy Sklyar at
>>[log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.311
>>################################################################
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>______________________________________________________
>Ken Patel                       Phone:  (408) 490-6804
>1708 McCarthy Blvd.             Fax:    (408) 490-6859
>Milpitas, CA 95035              Beeper: (888) 769-1808
>
>################################################################
>TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
>################################################################
>To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following
>text in the body:
>To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
>To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet
>################################################################
>Please visit IPC web site (http://jefry.ipc.org/forum.htm) for additional
>information.
>For the technical support contact Dmitriy Sklyar at [log in to unmask] or
>847-509-9700 ext.311
>################################################################
>
>

################################################################
TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet 
################################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://jefry.ipc.org/forum.htm) for additional information.
For the technical support contact Dmitriy Sklyar at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.311
################################################################


ATOM RSS1 RSS2