TECHNET Archives

February 1998

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Subject:
From:
Chris_Smith <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 17 Feb 1998 09:09:21 -0600
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To:
"TechNet E-Mail Forum." <[log in to unmask]>, Chris_Smith <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
     All,
       My company is contemplating switching to the sls65 flux for our wave
     solder processes.  We are currently using Alpha Metals NR210X no
     clean, but are not completely satisfied with the results.  A year or
     so ago (before I came on)the company ran a 55 gallon drum of SLS65
     flux through one of our solder waves.  From what I've heard and read
     it was a tremendous success with eliminating solder defects (mainly
     solder balls).  However, I myself have no history with this flux and
     was hoping that some of you who do can give your input.  Please let me
     know what you think.

     Thanks
     Chris Smith  M.E.

################################################################
TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet 
################################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://jefry.ipc.org/forum.htm) for additional information.
For the technical support contact Dmitriy Sklyar at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.311
################################################################


ATOM RSS1 RSS2