TECHNET Archives

January 1998

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Yves Trudell <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet Mail Forum.
Date:
Wed, 7 Jan 1998 10:34:06 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (111 lines)
I agree with Jerry Cupples' input with respect to improving ICT test pin
contact. Test pin selection and maintenance are of prime importance.
Keep in mind that  you may still run into contact problems if you use no
clean paste to coat the test points, but contact yields should still
improve.
One option that was not mentioned is that if you're looking for an
immediate yield increase with respect to test pin contact, program the
ICT to perform multiple "suck-downs" prior to testing each board. This
will allow the test pins to break through surface coatings. Keep in mind
that this will affect the tester maintenance schedules (including pin
wear).

Original notes:
>Wolfgang Erat said:
>
>>One of my customers is experiencing contacting problems at ICT on Entek
>>finished boards. How can I help my customer with this ? I have heard
>>about "Twister" testpins, increasing contacting force, tightly
>>controlling initial thickness of the coating itself etc.
>>What is your experience, What works in real life ?
>
>I recommend that you print solder paste on the test points so that it will
>reflow and leave a tin-lead surface. You can use a "spearpoint" test pin
>which has a higher normal force to break the organometallic coating, but it
>seems to me that modifying your stencil is a fairly inexpensive and
>effective way to deal with this.
>
>By design, most test points are clear and will take paste & reflow on top,
>or wave solder automatically if that's your process.
>
>I consider my life to be real. Maybe not - i.e., you are all just actors in
>the ongoing tragi-comedy drama. If this is fiction, thanks for all the
>effort out there, and your question is moot.
>
>
>regards,
>
>
>Jerry Cupples
>Interphase Corporation
>Dallas, TX USA


Yves Trudell
Quality System Engineering
Nortel, Wireless Networks Calgary


>----------
>From:  Jerry Cupples[SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
>Sent:  Tuesday, January 06, 1998 4:19 PM
>To:    [log in to unmask]
>Subject:       Re: [TN] Entek boards / In Circuit Testing problems
>
>Wolfgang Erat said:
>
>>One of my customers is experiencing contacting problems at ICT on Entek
>>finished boards. How can I help my customer with this ? I have heard
>>about "Twister" testpins, increasing contacting force, tightly
>>controlling initial thickness of the coating itself etc.
>>What is your experience, What works in real life ?
>
>I recommend that you print solder paste on the test points so that it will
>reflow and leave a tin-lead surface. You can use a "spearpoint" test pin
>which has a higher normal force to break the organometallic coating, but it
>seems to me that modifying your stencil is a fairly inexpensive and
>effective way to deal with this.
>
>By design, most test points are clear and will take paste & reflow on top,
>or wave solder automatically if that's your process.
>
>I consider my life to be real. Maybe not - i.e., you are all just actors in
>the ongoing tragi-comedy drama. If this is fiction, thanks for all the
>effort out there, and your question is moot.
>
>
>regards,
>
>
>Jerry Cupples
>Interphase Corporation
>Dallas, TX USA
>http://www.iphase.com/
>
>##############################################################
>TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
>##############################################################
>To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following
>text in the body:
>To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
>To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
>##############################################################
>Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
>information.
>For the technical support contact Dmitriy Sklyar at [log in to unmask] or
>847-509-9700 ext.311
>##############################################################
>

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional information.
For the technical support contact Dmitriy Sklyar at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.311
##############################################################


ATOM RSS1 RSS2