TECHNET Archives

January 1998

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Doug Pauls <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Fri, 30 Jan 1998 10:37:51 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
In a message dated 98-01-23 19:04:12 EST, you write:

>
>  TechNETers - Does anyone work to class 3 requirements AND use a no-clean
>  flux? Or do the more stringent requirements force you to use a more
>  aggressive flux and wash the board? Thanks for your comments in advance.
Joe
>

Joe,
A number of our clients are military class 3 and have qualified a number of
different low solids flux based assembly processes.  The greatest impediment
is usually cosmetics.  The "old school" said that if flux residues were
visible, it was bad.  That thinking is outdated, but still in force in some
project offices.

Doug Pauls
CSL

################################################################
TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet 
################################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://jefry.ipc.org/forum.htm) for additional information.
For the technical support contact Dmitriy Sklyar at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.311
################################################################


ATOM RSS1 RSS2