TECHNET Archives

January 1998

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Raymond Klein <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet Mail Forum.
Date:
Wed, 14 Jan 1998 11:56:42 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
Ken,

I usually take the other approach and specify thermal relief ONLY ON PIN
THROUGH PARTS. (No thermal relief is needed on press fit parts). Vias to
power and ground planes do not usually need thermal relief and it makes for
a much more continuous plane which give better electrical characteristics
and are easier for the PWB designer to route (vias can be closer together).
I've also had dense designs which would have had large gaps in the power
and ground planes if I'd used thermal relief on the hundreds of vias that
connected to these planes.

Problems with lack of thermal reliefs may occur if a very short and wide
(>.025 in) trace is used to connect a SMT part to a via to a gnd/pwr plane.

Ray Klein

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional information.
For the technical support contact Dmitriy Sklyar at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.311
##############################################################


ATOM RSS1 RSS2